I’m often asked — and occasionally in an
accusatory way — “Are you atheist?” And it’s like, you know, the only “ist” I am is a scientist,
all right? I don’t associate with movements. I’m not an “ism.” I just – I think for myself.
The moment when someone attaches to a philosophy or a movement, then they assign all the baggage
and all the rest of the philosophy that goes with it to you, and when you want to have
a conversation they will assert that they already know everything important there is
to know about you because of that association. And that’s not the way to have a conversation.
I’m sorry. It’s not. I’d rather we explore each other’s ideas in real time rather than
assign a label to it and assert, you know, what’s going to happen in advance. So what people are really after is, what is
my stance on religion or spirituality or God? And I would say, if I find a word that came
closest it would be agnostic. Agnostic — the word dates from the 19th century — Huxley
— to refer to someone who doesn’t know but hasn’t yet really seen evidence for it but
is prepared to embrace the evidence if it’s there but if it’s not won’t be forced to have
to think something that is not otherwise supported. There are many atheists who say, “Well, all
agnostics are atheists.” Okay. I’m constantly claimed by atheists. I find this intriguing.
In fact, on my Wiki page — I didn’t create the Wiki page, others did, and I’m flattered
that people cared enough about my life to assemble it — and it said, “Neil deGrasse
is an atheist.” I said, “Well that’s not really true.” I said, “Neil deGrasse is an agnostic.”
I went back a week later. It said, “Neil deGrasse is an atheist.” — again within a week — and
I said, “What’s up with that?” and I said, “I have to word it a little differently.”
So I said, okay, “Neil deGrasse, widely claimed by atheists, is actually an agnostic.” And some will say, well, that’s — “You’re
not being fair to the fact that they’re actually the same thing.” No, they’re not the same
thing, and I’ll tell you why. Atheists I know who proudly wear the badge are active atheists.
They’re like in your face atheist and they want to change policies and they’re having
debates. I don’t have the time, the interest, the energy to do any of that. I’m a scientist.
I’m an educator. My goal is to get people thinking straight in the first place, just
get you to be curious about the natural world. That’s what I’m about. I’m not about any of
the rest of this. And it’s odd that the word atheist even exists.
I don’t play golf. Is there a word for non-golf players? Do non-golf players gather and strategize?
Do non-skiers have a word and come together and talk about the fact that they don’t ski?
I don’t—I can’t do that. I can’t gather around and talk about how much everybody in
the room doesn’t believe in God. I just don’t—I don’t have the energy for that, and so I . . . Agnostic
separates me from the conduct of atheists whether or not there is strong overlap between
the two categories, and at the end of the day I’d rather not be any category at all.